Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
S.MURALIDHAR, TALWANT SINGH
Kulbhushan Sehgal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging dismissal for regularization (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. rti application reveals basis for regularization (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. basis for dismissal by cat analyzed (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. context of employment at aiims and icmr (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. directions for regularization after service duration (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. supreme court directive for project employees (Para 23 , 24) |
| 7. absorption policy established for long-term project employees (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 8. consistent application of previous judgments (Para 28 , 29) |
| 9. court's order for regularization of petitioner (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
ORDER
S. Muralidhar, J. The Petitioner has approached this Court by way of the present petition challenging an order dated 6th February, 2015 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (`CAT'), dismissing his OA No. 659/2014. By the said OA he had sought regularisation in the post of a Scientist in the Indian Council for Medical Research (`ICMR')/Respondent No. 2 herein, commensurate with his educational qualifications and experience.
2. The background facts are that the Petitioner joined the ICMR as a Statistica
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
