SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Anu Malhotra, J.
Arvind Kumar - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Bail.Appl. No. 1029 of 2019
Decided On : 28-01-2020




Failure to maintain sale records of narcotics and the involvement in drug trafficking established a prima facie violation of drug laws, justifying the denial of bail.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 21, 22, and 29 - Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 - Rule 65 and 65A - Bail application denied for alleged illegal sale and distribution of narcotics - The applicant failed to maintain records of narcotics sold and was linked through co-accused’s statements, highlighting his involvement in drug trafficking. (Paras 1, 4, 6, 12, 24, 26)

(B) The court noted that statements by conspirators are admissible against all involved, reinforcing the presumption of guilt in drug-related offenses under Section 54 of the NDPS Act. (Paras 24, 32)

(C) Regarding the quantity of psyschotropic drugs and narcotics involved, the court emphasized that the sale of medicines without maintenance of records established a prima facie violation. (Paras 14, 28)

Table of Content
1. allegations against the petitioner related to drug offenses. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 10)
2. procedural aspects of investigation and filings. (Para 2 , 5 , 12)
3. compliance with regulatory mandates regarding drug sales. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 15)
4. petitioner's argument on duration of custody & legality of sales. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
5. opposition's argument on conspiratorial liability and drug trafficking. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
6. legal principles regarding ndps and its applicability. (Para 24 , 25 , 27)
7. illegal sales and ramifications of drug law violations. (Para 26 , 28 , 29)
8. final determination on bail application. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)

JUDGMENT

Anu Malhotra, J. The applicant Arvind Kumar seeks the grant of bail in terms of Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., 1973 in Sessions Case No.374/2018 in relation to the alleged commission of the offences punishable under Sections 8 , 21, 22 and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985 with it having been alleged that for the entire quantity of seized narcotics and psychotropic substances, Harish Chander, proprietor of M/s Shiv Medicos and the present applicant, proprietor of M/s City Enterprises had not followed the mandated provisions of Rule 65 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945.

2. Notice of the petition was issued to the Central Bureau of Narcotics i.e. the respondent and both the applicant and the respondent have addressed their submissions qua the prayer made by the petitioner. Reply to the petition has been filed by the respondent. Written submissions on behalf of either side have also been submitted, perused and considered.

3. The allegations that have been made in the Sessions Case No.374/2018 filed by the respondent are to the effect that an information had been received that a person named Harish Chander proprietor of M/s Shiv Medicos (the co-accused presently in judicial custody) at 1706/8, First Floor, Milap Bhawan, Bhagirath Palace, Delhi-06 was selling narcotics and psychotropic medicines illegally at his shop and on search of his shop being conducted, the narcotics and psychotropic medicines were recovered in a huge quantity as detailed in the complaint.

4. The said co-accused Harish Chander as per the complaint was not able to produce any purchase or sale documents for these narcotics and psychotropic medicines which were thus seized under Rule 65 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 for violation of Rule 65A of the NDPS Act, 1985. The medicines so seized, were to the effect:

    "i. Alprazolam-2,06,125 tablets

    ii. Pentazocine inj.-3,194 ampules

    iii. Nitrazepam tablet-20,400 tablets.

    iv. Tramadol-1,28,880 tablets & capsules

    v. Diazepam-1,400 tablets.

    vi. Diazepam inj.-380 ampules.

    vii. Lorazepam-31260 tablets.

    viii. Chlordiazepoxide-7,800 tablets.

    ix. Clonazepam-3,190 tablets.

    x. Zolpidem-300 tablets.

    xi. Buprenorphine inj.-6,050 ampules.

    xii. Codeine Phosphate Syrup (100ml)-9,237 bottles.",

And samples were stated to have been drawn from the medicines seized from Sh. Harish Chander, proprietor of M/s Shiv Medicos.

5. During the course of the investigation conducted, the call details record of the co-accused Harish Chander seized from mobile numbers 8368673642 and 9871157024 were obtained from the concerned Nodal Officer and it was found in the CDRs of mobile number 8368673642 that there were frequent calls that had been made with mobile number 9728259445, which was registered in the name of Arvind Taluja, r/o Sonipat Haryana i.e. the present petitioner.

6. As per the complaint filed in Court on the basis of the statement of the accused Harish Chander and the report received from M/s Hariwin Pharma through M/s Laborate Pharmaceuticals, it came to notice that the mobile number 9728259445 mentioned in the bill of M/s City Enterprises, Daryaganj is the same number as mentioned by the co-accused Harish Chander in his statement. A search was thus conducted on 30.07.2018 at M/s City Enterprises, Daryaganj, New Delhi, but nothing incriminating was found nor was anything taken i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top