Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
ANU MALHOTRA
Arvind Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations against the petitioner related to drug offenses. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 10) |
| 2. procedural aspects of investigation and filings. (Para 2 , 5 , 12) |
| 3. compliance with regulatory mandates regarding drug sales. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 15) |
| 4. petitioner's argument on duration of custody & legality of sales. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. opposition's argument on conspiratorial liability and drug trafficking. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. legal principles regarding ndps and its applicability. (Para 24 , 25 , 27) |
| 7. illegal sales and ramifications of drug law violations. (Para 26 , 28 , 29) |
| 8. final determination on bail application. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
JUDGMENT
Anu Malhotra, J. The applicant Arvind Kumar seeks the grant of bail in terms of Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., 1973 in Sessions Case No.374/2018 in relation to the alleged commission of the offences punishable under Sections 8 , 21, 22 and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985 with it having been alleged that for the entire quantity of seized narcotics and psychotropic substances, Harish Chander, proprietor of M/s Shiv Medicos and the present applicant, proprietor of M/s City Enterprises had not followed the mandated provisions of Rule 65 of th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
