Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Sudhakar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Webkul Software Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. defendants' defense struck off for procedural non-compliance. (Para 1) |
| 2. defendants argue summons inadequately required affidavits. (Para 2) |
| 3. court highlights deficiencies in affidavit requirements. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 4. rejection of defense based on affidavit deficiencies incorrect. (Para 4) |
| 5. order for legal process amendments. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--The present petition impugns order dated 14th August, 2019 by which the defence of the Defendants/Petitioners (hereinafter, "Defendants") has been struck off by the ld. ADJ. The said order reads as under:
"Application u/S. 151 CPC alongwith Court fees was filed by plaintiff on 01.04.2019. As the Court fees has been filed in compliance of Order dated 16.03.2019, application is allowed and Court fees is taken on record.
Written statement was filed by defendants on 07.06.2019 alongwith application seeking condonation of delay. Copy stated to be supplied. Submissions heard on the application. It is argued by Ld. Counsel for defendants that the issue in the present dispute pertains to functioning of computers, especially software and coding which require specialised/technical understanding as well as r
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
