SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
NBCC (India) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
TH. Jadumani Singh – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's challenge to trial court's order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court's reasoning on necessity of documents. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. no infirmity found in trial court's order. (Para 10)
4. petition disposed, directions confirmed. (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)

CM APPL.50059/2019 (exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

C.R.P. 265/2019 & CM APPL.50058/2019 (stay), CM APPL.50060/2019 (stay)

1. Petitioner impugns order dated 17.07.2019, whereby, the application of the respondent under Order 11 Rule 12 and 14 CPC has been allowed and respondent has been directed to produce the documents.

2. Respondent had filed the subject suit for recovery of Rs.36,40,000/- being the balance amount payable to the respondent for execution of the contract.

3. One of the issues raised by the petitioner in its defence was that they had imposed liquidated damages and the amount was not payable. After the written statement was filed, subject application under Order 11 Rule 12 and 14 CPC was filed seeking the petitioner to discover the following documents:

S.No.Documents
1.Details of Extension of time given during the course of contr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top