SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Jitender Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. conviction details and facts of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments against the conviction. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court's analysis of evidence and conviction. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. probation principles and judicial discretion. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
5. conclusion on probation application. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)

JUDGMENT

1. The present revision petition is directed against the impugned judgment dated 29.08.2018 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge in CRL.A. 263/2017 arising out of FIR No. 388/2008 registered under Sections 419/420/468/471/120B IPC, P.S. Defence Colony wherein the petitioner's conviction under Section 420 IPC was modified and altered to one S. 420/511 IPC. The petitioner's sentence for the offence punishable under Sections 420/511 IPC was also modified and altered to RI for two years and fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default to whereof to undergo SI for six months. The petitioner's conviction under Sections 468/471 IPC and sentence was maintained.

2. Earlier the Metropolitan Magistrate vide judgment dated 24.05.2017 had convicted the petitioner under Sections 420/468/471 IPC and sentenced the petitioner to RI for two years for the offence under

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top