Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
G.S.SISTANI, JYOTI SINGH
Smriti Madan Kansagra – Appellant
Versus
Perry Kansagra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for directions regarding chargesheet. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. overview of guardianship proceedings and background. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. importance of child's welfare in custody decisions. (Para 18 , 19 , 57 , 76) |
| 4. arguments regarding fitness of parents for guardianship. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 26 , 70) |
| 5. final judgment dismissing the appeal. (Para 90) |
JUDGMENT
G.S. Sistani, J.
CM 49507/2018
1. By this application, the appellant had sought a direction to the respondent for producing the chargesheet in CMCR 997/2018 titled Republic v. Perry Mansukh Kansagra & Ors. The application was heard on 20.12.2018 and it was decided that the application would be taken up for hearing along with the appeal.
2. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant has filed a certified copy of the chargesheet with Diary No.141190 and the effect of the criminal proceedings has been noticed by us in our detailed judgment. As such, no further orders are required to be passed in the application and it is, accordingly, disposed of.
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 30/2018
3. The present appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the FAMILY COURTS ACT , 1984 impugning the judgment dated 12.01.2
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
