Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Amarjeet – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of case and conviction details (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. appellant's legal arguments against conviction (Para 5) |
| 3. evidence presented during trial (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court's evaluation of testimonies and contradictions (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. court's validation of victim testimony and dismissal of appeal (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. final judgment and order (Para 25) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning a judgment dated 08.04.2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, North West 01, Rohini District Courts, Delhi, whereby the appellant was convicted for an offence under Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO). The appellant also impugns the order on sentence dated 18.04.2016, whereby he was sentenced to ten years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/- for committing an offence under Section 6 of the POCSO. The appellant was also directed to serve simple imprisonment for a further period of six months, if he defaulted in the payment of the said fine.
2. The impugned judgment was rendered in connection with a case arising from FIR N
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
