SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
State (NCT of Delhi) – Appellant
Versus
Saan Mohd. @ Sonu – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, J. (Oral)

CRL. M.A.4692/2020 (exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

CRL.L.P. 186/2020

1. By the present Leave Petition filed under Section 378 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as `Cr.P.C.') the State seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 23.10.2019 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-09 (POCSO) West District, Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi, whereby the respondent No. 1/ Saan Mohd. @ Sonu was acquitted of the charges punishable under Sections 363/366/34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as `IPC') and Sections 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as `POCSO') and Respondent No. 2/Neeraj was acquitted of the charges punishable under Sections 363/366/34 IPC and Sections 17 POCSO.

2. The brief facts of the case, as mentioned by the learned Trial Court are reproduced as under:

    "1. The accused persons namely Saan Mohd. @ Sonu and Smt. Neeraj have been sent for trial by Police Station Ranhola for the offences punishable under Section 363/364/34 of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top