SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Anu Malhotra, J.
Amit Aggarwal - Appellant
Versus
State NCT of Delhi - Respondent
Bail Application No. 519 of 2020
Decided On : 18-03-2020




Anticipatory bail can be granted when the investigation is ongoing, and the accused has cooperated, particularly in the absence of immediate threat and where allegations are contested and delayed.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 438 r/w Section 482 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 325/354/506/34 - Anticipatory bail application - Accused sought bail following allegations of assault and harassment against the complainant's husband by the accused and his associates - Background of cross FIR regarding allegations of molestation also presented - FIR No. 11/2020 was registered after grievous injuries were reported, yet significant delays and inconsistencies in witness statements led to questioning of immediate threat and necessity for custodial interrogation - The court emphasized the principle of evaluating the merits of cases individually, highlighting the need for community involvement in settling disputes and the risks of further charges impacting the bail application. (Paras 1-24)

Facts of the case:
The applicant, charged under Sections 325/354/506/34 IPC, was denied anticipatory bail; the complainant alleged various harassments and physical assaults from the applicant and his associates. Statement under Section 164 CrPC revealed a history of escalating conflict between the parties.

Findings of Court:
The court noted the delayed registration of the FIR and inconsistencies in testimonies while stating that the applicant had cooperated in investigations and arrest should not be a method of resolving disputes. It ruled that the allegations, though serious, lacked immediate evidence justifying further detention.

Issues: The core issues involved the necessity of custodial interrogation for proper investigation and the legitimacy of the assault allegations, given the context of cross complaints and prior disputes between neighbors.

Ratio Decidendi: The court underscored the necessity of treating each case uniquely and found that while the allegations were grave, the circumstances did not justify the applicant's continued custody, allowing for the bail subject to conditions.

Result: Anticipatory bail granted on conditions prescribed.

JUDGMENT

Anu Malhotra, J. The applicant seeks grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 r/w Section 482 of the Cr.PC, 1973 in relation to allegations levelled against him qua FIR No.11/2020, PS Maurya Enclave, under Sections 325/354/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. Notice of the application was issued to the respondent no.1/the State and to the complainant of the FIR in question. The status report has been submitted on behalf of the State dated 20.02.2020 under the signatures of the SHO, PS Maurya Enclave, which reads to the effect:

    "....

    Complainant alleged in her complaint that accused Amit Aggarwal is her neighbor and stays in the same building at Ground floor. Amit has carried out illegal construction and has encroached upon the common area at the ground floor near stair case. Due to this encroachment, water drainage pipe of her residence was damaged and to make it functional, a temporary bent was fixed. Due to this bent, the drainage pipe often used to get blocked. In this regard, whenever her husband requested Amit to get their drainage pipe repaired but he refused and started mis-behaving with her husband. She further alleged, on 6-11-2019, her husband went out for his work at Financial Commissioner, Sham Nath Marg, Civil Lines at around 12 p.m. She was alone at home when Amit Aggarwal's wife came to her house and asked her to open the gate to which She asked her for what purpose she has come. She replied that she and her husband wanted to get their water tank repaired, kept at the terrace above her house. She called her husband through our landline phone and made Amit's wife to speak to her husband. During their conversation, her husband objected as she was alone at home and requested them to get our drainage pipe also repaired and get their water tank repaired thereafter and she went back. Thereafter, Amit along with his two associates namely Sheru and one another, and a plumber came to her house and started shouting at her to open the main gate installed in the stair case outside her house. Initially, she did not open the door as She was afraid that Amit would harm her. After few minutes, Amit again told her in a polite manner "AUNTY, DARWAZA KHOLO MUJHE BAS TANKI (WATER TANK) SAAF KARWANI HAI PLUMBER SE". Upon his assurance, she opened the door and Amit immediately pushed her and touched her chest and pushed her aside and ran above to the terrace with his associates and plumber. Thereafter, she called her husband & apprised him about the incident. Her husband came & went to the terrace & requested the plumber to stop the work. Amit got infuriated on this and took the iron pipe (rod) and hit her husband on his left hand. Thereafter, Amit shouted "BUDHE! AAJ TO MAIN TERA KAAM TAMAAM KAR DUNGA....CHUHE TUJHE CHHAT SE UTHAKAR NEECHE PHENK DUNGA". Further, Amit asked his associates for help and asked the plumber to give him Axe (AARI) & then Amit put that "AARI" on her husband's neck. Somehow, her husband got himself free & ran. Amit caught hold off her Husband & threw him on the floor &her husband fell on his back & hurt his spines badly. Her husband got up again & went down to the room & called the PCR at 2.16 PM& thereafter, called PCR 3-4 times. Thereafter, Amit's wife & mother came to the terrace & started abusing her & her husband. After sometime, PCR came to their residence and took her husband to BSA Hospital, Sector-6, Rohini, Delhi for treatment. As per the contents of the complaint & nature of injuries sustained by Deepak Kohli (Husband of complainant) a case vide FIR No. 11/2020 U/s 325/354/506/34 IPC was registered at PS Maurya Enclave and investigation was handed over to ASI Manoj Raghav.

    During investigation, statement U/s 164 CrPC of the complainant was recorded in which she supported her allegations mentioned in FIR. Thereafter, accused Amit Aggarwal filed an application for anticipatory bail before the Hon'ble District & Sessions Court, Rohini where both the parties submitted that they bot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top