SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
State (NCT of Delhi) – Appellant
Versus
Vishal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. By this petition under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter as `Cr.P.C'), the appellant/State seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 01.09.2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, POCSO Court, North West District, Rohini Court, Delhi whereby the respondent/Vishal was acquitted of the charge under Section 12 of POCSO Act and Section 504 read with Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter as `IPC') in FIR No.659/2013, Police Station Sultan Puri.

2. Brief facts of the case, as noticed by the learned Trial Court, are as under:

    "i. On 12.07.2013 Smt. R and Sh. M came to PS alongwith their respective daughters S and P and reported that one boy Vishal who is student of class IX in the school of victims has misbehaved with their daughters yesterday and today and also threatened to deface them with blade and acid.

    ii. DD No. 25A was recorded in this regard and NGO was called to counsel the victims and there statements were recorded where they stated that they are students of class VII in govt. school D-2, Sultan Puri and on 11.07.2013, they were standing at the door of their class room when the neighbor Vish

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top