SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, C.HARI SHANKAR
Naresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Director of Education – Respondent


Table of Content
1. impact of covid-19 on educational institutions. (Para 2 , 4)
2. petitioner's standing and claims in court. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. observations on online education. (Para 9 , 10)
4. arguments regarding tuition fees during lockdown. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
5. interpretation of rule 165 and fee chargeability. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
6. financial hardships and online access provisions. (Para 17 , 18)
7. relief under disaster management act. (Para 19 , 20)
8. overall balance and conclusion drawn by the court. (Para 22 , 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT

D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (Oral)--The Court is convened through Video Conferencing.

2. Consequent on the global devastation wrought by the n-COVID-2019 pandemic, to which India is no exception, the executive administration in this country has had to take certain hard- hitting decisions, and to put in place a slew of curbs, restraints, and containments, so as to minimise, to the extent possible, the societal effect of the viral pandemic. Many establishments and offices, save and except those which render essential services, or trade in essential goods and commodities, have had to be shut down, and a near complete lockdown imposed, on a national scale,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top