SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Ajay Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Sonia Gupta – Respondent


Table of Content
1. context of maintenance petition (Para 1 , 4)
2. evidence by affidavit in maintenance proceedings (Para 2 , 5 , 12 , 50)
3. requirements for evidence under cr.pc (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. family courts' discretion on procedure (Para 18 , 20 , 28 , 47)
5. civil nature of maintenance proceedings (Para 24 , 36 , 46)

JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 14.03.2019 (hereafter the `impugned order') passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Courts, Tis Hazari Courts (the Family Court) in Maintenance Petition No. 142/2014 titled `Sonia Gupta v Ajay Gupta'. By the impugned order, the Family Court, inter alia, rejected the petitioner's application under Section 126 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereafter `Cr.PC') praying that the evidence filed by the respondent by way of an affidavit (Ex.PW1/A) be struck off and the respondent be directed to examine herself in accordance with the procedure prescribed under Cr.PC.

2. The petitioner contends that the proceedings under Section 125 Cr.PC are required to be conducted in accordance with the procedure prescribed under Section 126 Cr.PC. It is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top