Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, SANJEEV NARULA
O.P. Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to haryana's movement restrictions. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner argues against transport restrictions. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's view on constitutional infringement. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. state's obligations concerning movement. (Para 9 , 11) |
| 5. dismissal of petition with appreciation. (Para 12 , 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The present petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.
2. It is pertinent to mention that the present public interest litigation has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to respondent No.1 (Union of India) to take action against respondent No.2 (State of Haryana) for adopting a restrictive policy and not allowing the movement of people involved in essential services like doctors, nurses, paramedics, sanitation workers, staff of Delhi Police, Delhi Transport Corporation, Delhi Jal Board, Municipal Corporations etc. between Delhi and Haryana and to direct the respondent No.2 not to restrict the movement of trucks to and fro between Delhi and Haryana.
3. In the present writ petition it has been averred that the petitioner had come to know through newspapers reports dated 29th April, 20
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
