SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
G – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. mandatory presence of informant during bail hearings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. provisions under the pocso act concerning child victims. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court directives to ensure compliance of practice directions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. issues regarding notice to complainants in bail applications. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
5. court's concern over non-compliance of legal requirements. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
6. importance of hearing complainants before bail decisions. (Para 15 , 16)
7. reaffirmation of legal requirements and court procedure. (Para 18 , 19)
8. responsibility of courts to ensure notice is served. (Para 20 , 21)
9. issuance of orders to enhance compliance of legal mandates. (Para 22 , 23 , 24)
10. court's conclusion for setting aside improper bail orders. (Para 25 , 26 , 27)

JUDGMENT

1. The present Petition highlights a perennial and grave problem of hearing not being afforded to victims/complainants/informants, in bail applications filed on behalf of those accused who are facing trial under the provisions of Sections 3 76 (3), 376- AB, 376 - DA or 376 DB of the IPC dealing with rape of women below 12, 16 years of age including gang rapes as also under the provisions of Protect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top