SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
G - Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi - Respondent
Crl.M.C. 1474 of 2020 & Crl.M.As. 6330 of 2020, 6705 of 2020
Decided On : 05-06-2020




Victims' right to be heard in bail applications is paramount, emphasizing procedural compliance following legislative amendments.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018 - Section 439 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Amendment mandates the presence of an informant at bail hearings for specific offences - This provision must be strictly followed for victims' rights to be safeguarded. (Paras 2, 18, 26)

(B) POCSO Act - Provides special provisions for child sexual offences, including a reversed burden of proof for certain offences - The Act enhances protections for minors in legal proceedings. (Paras 4, 5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner highlighted non-issuance of notice to the complainant in bail applications involving serious offences against children. This lack of compliance has been widespread, indicating a systemic failure in respecting victims' rights. (Paras 10, 21)

Findings of Court:
The Court ruled that the order granting interim bail was unjust due to non-notification and thus set it aside, emphasizing the need for adherence to legal mandates regarding victims' rights. (Paras 18, 26)

Issues: The main issues included the necessity of hearing the complainant before granting bail and non compliance with statutory requirements.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed that the legislative mandate requires victim presence at bail hearings and that failure to notify constitutes a serious procedural lapse.

Result: The interim bail granted was set aside; the accused's new bail application must be considered lawfully with regard to the victim's involvement.

Table of Content
1. mandatory presence of informant during bail hearings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. provisions under the pocso act concerning child victims. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court directives to ensure compliance of practice directions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. issues regarding notice to complainants in bail applications. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
5. court's concern over non-compliance of legal requirements. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
6. importance of hearing complainants before bail decisions. (Para 15 , 16)
7. reaffirmation of legal requirements and court procedure. (Para 18 , 19)
8. responsibility of courts to ensure notice is served. (Para 20 , 21)
9. issuance of orders to enhance compliance of legal mandates. (Para 22 , 23 , 24)
10. court's conclusion for setting aside improper bail orders. (Para 25 , 26 , 27)

JUDGMENT

1. The present Petition highlights a perennial and grave problem of hearing not being afforded to victims/complainants/informants, in bail applications filed on behalf of those accused who are facing trial under the provisions of Sections 3 76 (3), 376- AB, 376 - DA or 376 DB of the IPC dealing with rape of women below 12, 16 years of age including gang rapes as also under the provisions of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences ("POCSO") Act, 2012.

2. As per the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018, Section 439 of the Cr. P.C. was amended with effect from 21st April, 2020 by which it was made mandatory for the informant or any other person authorised by the informant to be present at the time of hearing of an application for bail filed by the accused under these provisions. The said amendment reads as under:

"23. In Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure-

(a) In sub-section (1), after the first proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:

"Provided further that the High Court or the Court of Session shall, before granting bail to a person who is accused of an offence triable under sub-Section (3) of Section 3 76 or Section 3 76 -AB or Section 3 76 -DA or Section 3 76 -DB of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (45 of 1860), give notice of the application for bail to the Public Prosecutor within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of the notice of such application."

(b) After sub-section(1), the following sub-section shall be inserted, namely:

"(1-A) The presence of the informant or any person authorized by him shall be obligatory at the time of hearing of the application for bail to the person under sub-section (3) of section 376 or section 376-AB or section 376-DA or section 376-DB of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (45 of 1860)."

3. The Delhi High Court issued `Practice Directions' on 24th September, 2019 to ensure compliance of the above amendment and directed as under:

"In order to ensure better and effective compliance of the above provisions, Hon'ble the Chief Justice has been pleased to direct as under:

(a) Before granting bail to a person who is accused of an offence triable under sub- Section (3) of Section 3 76 or Section 3 76 -AB or Section 3 76 -DA or Section 3 76 -DB of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , the High Court or the Court of Session shall give notice of the application for bail to the Public Prosecutor within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of the notice of such application; and

(b) The Courts shall ensure that the Investigating Officer has, in writing as per Annexure A, communicated to the informant or any person authorized by her that her presence is obligatory at the time of hearing of the application for bail to the person under sub-section (3) of section 376 or section 376-AB or section 376-DA or section 376-DB of the INDIAN PENAL CODE . Annexure A shall be filed by the I.O. along with the Reply/Status Report to such bail application and the Courts shall make all endeavour to ensure presence of the informant or any person authorized by her."

As per the above Practice Directions, a format was prescribed for the communication to the informant by the Investigating Officer.

4. The P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top