SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Lal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

2. With the consent of parties, the present appeal is taken up for final disposal today.

3. Vide the present appeal, the appellant seeks directions thereby to allow the present appeal and set aside the order dated 03.04.2020 passed by the Ld. Additional Sessions Judge-02, South West, District Courts, Dwarka, in Bail Application No. 1485/2020. He further seeks directions thereby to grant regular bail to the appellant in the case arising out of the FIR No. 139 dated 05.03.2020, under Sections 3 (1)(r)(s)(g)/3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 447 /506/34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 and Section 65 , 66, 66 E, 43 (i) and 43 (j) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (subsequently added), registered at PS Najafgarh, Dwarka, Delhi.

4. Initially the appellant filed Bail Application No. 779/2020 and for said purpose, the application was listed before this Court on 24.04.2020 wherein learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the complainant had strongly opposed the bail application on the ground that no such application lie

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top