IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
Prakash Jarwal - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Bail Appln. 1348 of 2020
Decided On : 24-06-2020
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of bail application under cr.p.c. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defences regarding allegations and malicious intent. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. legal standards for abetment and extortion claims. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. evidence gathering and witness statements. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. prior allegations against petitioner and relevance to current matter. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. dispute over nature of complaints and evidence. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. responses from djb regarding engagement of water tankers. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 8. proximate cause requirement in suicide cases. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 9. assessment of threats and witness influences. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 10. order granting bail. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 11. compliance and distribution of order. (Para 41 , 42) |
JUDGMENT
1. The present petition has been filed under section 439 Cr.P.C. for seeking bail in pursuance to FIR No.213/2020 dated 18.04.2020 registered at Police Station Neb Sarai for the offences punishable under sections 386/506/306/34 IPC.
2. Petitioner is sitting MLA from Deoli Assembly Constituency of NCT of Delhi. He remained in police custody in above-mentioned case since 09.05.2020 to 16.05.2020 but the IO himself filed an application for sending the Petitioner to JC and on 17.05.2020 the Petitioner was sent to JC as the investigation qua him had been completed.
3. Ms.Rebecca M. John, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that in the FIR itself, it has been mentioned by the complainant that wife of deceased gave one complaint to the Delhi Jal Board on 09.04.2020 as DD No.5378, just one week before the suicide, against the Petitioner but contrary to said fact in the said complaint, name of the Petitioner as well as name of co-accused persons has not been mentioned. Further no allegations of extortion or threat has been made by wife of deceased in the said complaint. Moreover, the deceased or his family members were plying water tanker since 2006 and it has been alleged that the deceased was giving money to the Petitioner since he became MLA first time but the deceased or his family members didn't give any complaint to any authorities including police in last 5-6 years.
4. Learned senior counsel further submitted that the alleged suicide note is fabricated and the same is in two different hand writing with different pens. The name of the Petitioner has been written with different pen which does not bear the signature of the deceased on the second portion of the suicide note. The alleged suicide letter is on public domain face book etc.
5. It is submitted that the deceased was running water tankers in DJB since 2007 and he was engaged in illegal activities of selling water of poor persons to Sanik Vihar Farm owners for Rs.1,500/- per tanker. There were various complaints against the deceased and his syndicate of selling water tankers upon which a sting operation was conducted by News Channel IBN in the month of June, 2015 in which the deceased along with his associates was caught on camera in a sting operation. After the said sting operation, name of deceased was blacklisted from DJB and his family members, therefore, they had grudges against petitioner and his known persons.
6. Learned senior counsel further submitted that the petitioner through his Advocate filed RTI before DJB on 24.04.2020, however, reply dated 24.04.2020 reveals that the competent authority DJB disengaged 9 water tankers which were running in the name of the deceased and his family members because he was caught red handed in the black marketing of the water tankers in a sting operation as mentioned above. In addition, since 2015 to 2020, no water tanker was running in the name of deceased. While instead of engaging the water tankers in his own name as he was blacklisted from DJB, deceased engaged 5 water tankers in the name of his wife and other relatives one of which namely Hamender was also seen in sting operat
AI
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.