IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
D.N. Patel, Prateek Jalan, JJ.
Vikrant Tongad - Appellant
Versus
Union of India (MOEFCC) - Respondent
W.P.(C) 3747 of 2020 & CM Appl. 13426 of 2020
Decided On : 30-06-2020
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for extension of draft eia notification (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. provision of environment protection act relevant to public notification (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. notice period extension during the pandemic (Para 5) |
| 4. clarification on objection time limit and public consultation (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. need for translation of notification into vernacular languages (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. writ petition allowed with directions (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT
D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (Oral)
Proceedings of the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.
1. This petition has been preferred with the following prayers:
"a. Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondent to extend the notice period to the public, in the draft EIA notification 2020 until 30 September, 2020 or till such further period till the Covid-19 lockdown/restrictions subsist;
b. Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction to the Respondent to make translated copies of the draft notification available across the country in the official vernacular languages mentioned in the Eighth Schedule to the Constitution and upload the same on all its websites including those of the Environment Ministries of all the States as well as those of the State Pollution Control Boards;
c. Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondent to conduct consultations with various stakeholders and concerned persons across the country through its State Pollution Control Boards, as a precondition to considering the draft notification;
d. Pass any other directions or orders as deemed fit by this Hon'ble Court."
2. The Central Government, in exercise of the power conferred by Section 3 (1) and Section 3 (2)(v) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, issued a draft notification dated 23rd March, 2020 for imposing certain restrictions and prohibition on the undertaking some projects or expansion or modernisation of such existing projects entailing capacity addition, in any part of India. This draft notification was issued for the information of the public likely to be affected thereby and inviting any objections or suggestions on the proposal contained in the draft notification in writing for consideration of the Central Government and notice was given that the said draft notification shall be taken into consideration on or after the expiry of a period of sixty days from the date on which the copies of the gazette containing notification are made available to the public. This draft notification was published on 11th April, 2020 in the Gazette of India.
3. For ready reference Section 3 (1) and Section 3 (2)(v) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 read as under:
"3. POWER OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT TO TAKE MEASURES TO PROTECT AND IMPROVE ENVIRONMENT.--(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, the Central Government, shall have the power to take all such measures as it deems necessary or expedient for the purpose of protecting and improving the quality of the environment and preventing controlling and abating environmental pollution.
xx xx xx
(2)(v) restriction of areas in which any industries, operations or processes or class of industries, operations or processes shall not be carried out or shall be carried out subject to certain safeguards;"
4. The original notification was published on 11th April, 2020 under Rule 5(3)(c) of Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 to be read with Section 3 of Environment Protection Act, 1986. For ready reference Rule 5(3)(a) and Rule 5(3)(c) of the of Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 read as under:
"5. Prohibitions and restrictions on the location of industries and the carrying on processes and operations in different areas
....
(3) (a) Whenever it appears to the Central Government that it is expedient to impose prohibition or restrictions on the locations Of an industry or the carrying on of processe
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.