Rajender alias Raju vs State

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Rajender alias Raju – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Table of Content
1. details of the assault incident (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. arguments regarding credibility of testimony (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. testimonies and evidence evaluation (Para 13 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
4. application of pocso act and sentencing (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
5. dismissal of appeal (Para 24 , 25)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)--The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. In view of order dated 23.06.2020, the next date of hearing i.e. 19.08.2020 is cancelled. The appeal is taken up for final disposal.

3. Appellant impugns judgement on conviction dated 21.11.2019 and order on sentence dated 27.11.2019 whereby appellant has been convicted of an offence under Section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as the POCSO Act for short) and has been sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo imprisonment for a period of one month.

4. The case of the prosecution is that the victim girl, then aged 9 years, a student of Class-IV, made a complaint that on 21.08.2015 at 2.30 p.m. whe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTSANJEEV SACHDEVARajender alias Raju – AppellantVersusState – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Rajender alias Raju – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent