SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
J.R. Midha, J.
Kusum Sharma - Appellant
Versus
Mahinder Kumar Sharma - Respondent
FAO 369 of 1996
Decided On : 06-08-2020




The court mandated detailed affidavits of assets, income, and expenditure in maintenance cases to ensure fair and timely determinations while emphasizing the necessity of maintenance as a basic human right.

Headnote:(A) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 24 and 25 - Guidelines for maintenance and permanent alimony - The court established the necessity for both parties to file detailed affidavits of their assets, income, and expenditure for determining maintenance in matrimonial disputes - The court recognized that maintenance is a human right essential for survival, particularly for the weaker sections of society (Paras 9, 26, 66).

(B) Principles for judicial proceedings - Highlighted the duty of courts to ensure a timely and effective resolution of maintenance applications to prevent vagrancy and destitution of the needy spouse - The court emphasized the importance of ascertaining truth in judicial processes to uphold dignity and maintain public confidence in justice (Paras 9, 36, 70).

Facts of the case:
The case involves the appellant seeking modifications in the procedures followed regarding maintenance cases, alongside established guidelines for filing affidavits.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the formulation of a comprehensive affidavit system to ensure both parties disclose relevant financial details to facilitate just determinations of maintenance.

Issues: The court addressed how to balance the rights of parties in matrimonial disputes while ensuring that claims for maintenance are processed without undue delay.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that maintenance applications must be processed expeditiously, with an emphasis on financial transparency by both parties, to address the needs of dependent individuals promptly and effectively.

Result: The modified directions and affidavit formats are enforced in relevant matrimonial cases.

Table of Content
1. court examines financial capacity for maintenance. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. feedback from family courts considered for guidelines. (Para 4 , 7 , 10)
3. importance of comprehensive affidavits in maintenance. (Para 5 , 9)
4. supreme court relevance on maintenance principles. (Para 6 , 11 , 12)
5. sections 24 and 25 provisions for alimony. (Para 19 , 25)
6. modified affidavit procedures established for cases. (Para 64 , 65 , 84)
7. future guidelines and practices on maintenance discussed. (Para 88 , 91)

JUDGMENT

1. In matrimonial cases, the Court has to ascertain the financial capacity/status of both the parties for fixing maintenance. In many developed countries, the law prescribes a comprehensive format of assets, income and expenditure to be filed by both the parties at the very threshold of matrimonial litigation. However, there is no provision of law in our country for directing the parties to disclose their assets, income and expenditure in a particular format.

2. Vide judgment dated 14th January, 2015, this Court, after considering the International Best Practices, issued directions and formulated an affidavit of assets, income and expenditure to be filed by both parties at the very threshold of matrimonial litigation. This Court modified the aforesaid directions and format of assets, income and expenditure vide judgments dated 29th May, 2017 and 06th December, 2017.

3. In the earlier judgments dated 14th January, 2015; 29th May, 2017 and 06th December, 2017, this Court considered ten affidavits of assets, income and expenditure used in five countries. Fifty more formats of affidavits of assets, income and expenditure of various countries namely U.S.A., U.K., Ireland, Singapore, Canada, Australia and South Africa have now come to the notice of this Court thereby warranting modification of the judgment dated 06th December, 2017.

4. The Family Courts have sent their response/feedback and further suggestions to the working of the guidelines mentioned in the judgment dated 06th December, 2017 which have been considered by this Court. Mr. Sunil Mittal, Senior Advocate and Ms. Anu Narula, Advocate, assisting this Court as amici curiae, have given further suggestions which have also been considered.

5. In Bhandari Engineers & Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Maharia Raj Joint Venture, (2020) 266 DLT 106 (hereinafter referred to as Bhandari Engineers I), this Court formulated an affidavit of assets, income and expenditure to be filed by the judgment-debtor in execution cases. Vide judgment dated 05th August, 2020 in Bhandari Engineers & Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Maharia Raj Joint Venture (hereinafter referred to as Bhandari Engineers II), this Court modified and improved the format of affidavits of assets, income and expenditure to make it more comprehensive and further directions have been passed so that the execution cases are decided within a period of one year from the date of their institution.

6. The affidavits formulated by this Court in Bhandari Engineers II are far more comprehensive than the affidavit formulated by this Court for matrimonial cases. This Court considers it appropriate to incorporate the benevolent features of Bhandari Engineers II in the format of the affidavits of assets, income and expenditure in this case.

7. On careful consideration of the directions issued by this Court in Bhandari Engineers II; International Best Practices used in the developed countries; feedback and suggestions of the Family Courts and the suggestions of the learned amici curiae, the directions issued by this Court in judgment dated 18th September, 2014 - (2014) 214 DLT 493 (hereinafter referred to as `Kusum Sharma I'); judgment dated 14th January, 2015 - (2015) 217 DLT 706 (hereinafter referred to as `Kusum Sharma II'); judgment dated 29th May, 2017 - MANU/DE/2406/2017 (hereinafter referred to as `Kusum Sharma III') and judgment dated 06th December, 2017 - (2018



























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top