SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, Asha Menon, JJ.
Sonu - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) No. 3311 of 2020
Decided On : 05-08-2020




The requirement of skill grade 'A' for discharge from service for civil posts by IAF was deemed arbitrary and unreasonable, justifying the issuance of a writ of mandamus for discharge.

Headnote:(A) Air Force Orders (AFO) No. 14/2008 and No. 33/2017 - Writ of mandamus sought for the issuance of No Objection Certificate (NOC) and discharge from service - The petitioner, a Corporal in the Indian Air Force, was denied discharge due to lack of skill grade 'A'; the court found this refusal arbitrary as per prior judgment in Subhash Chand v. Union of India. (Paras 2, 22, 25)

(B) Criteria for Discharge - AFO No.33/2017's additional clause requiring skill grade 'A' for civil post applications was held unreasonable; the court reiterates the significance of enabling airmen to enhance their career prospects. (Paras 23, 24)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was enrolled in the IAF, achieved Corporal rank, and completed a postgraduate degree. He sought a NOC for a civil post, adhering to prior Air Force Orders. His skill grade was initially 'B', but he later achieved 'A'. The respondents denied him permission citing procedural failures and skill grade discrepancies.

Findings of Court:
The court recognized the petitioner’s entitlement to discharge from service due to his enhanced skill grade and dismissed the reasoning of the IAF as invalid.

Issues: The main issues revolved around the legality and fairness of the refusal of NOC and discharge based on the enhanced skill grade and procedure application.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the additional restrictions placed by AFO No.33/2017 were arbitrary and unreasonable; it cited the earlier ruling which invalidated the same requirement.

Result: Petition allowed, mandamus issued to discharge the petitioner (Paras 25, 26).

JUDGMENT

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. The petitioner, a Corporal in the respondents no.1 to 3 Indian Air Force (IAF), having been denied No Objection Certificate (NOC) as well as discharge from service of the respondents no.1 to 3 IAF, for joining the post of Assistant Professor (College Cadre) in the subject of Economics in the Department of Higher Education of the Government of Haryana, on the ground of the petitioner not having skill grade `A', has filed this petition seeking mandamus, directing the respondents no.1 to 3 IAF to issue NOC as well as discharge from service to the petitioner for joining the post of Assistant Professor (College Cadre) in the subject of Economics in Haryana.

2. It is the case of the petitioner, that (i) the petitioner, after completing his 10+2 applied for the post of Aircraftsman with the respondents no.1 to 3 IAF and on being successful, was on 29th December, 2010 enrolled as an Aircraftsman; (ii) the petitioner was promoted to the rank of Corporal on 3rd January, 2016; (iii) the petitioner, with the approval of the respondents no.1 to 3 IAF, completed his post graduation in Economics while serving the IAF; (iv) the respondents no.1 to 3 IAF encourages career progression for all airmen, while in service of IAF; (v) Air Force Order (AFO) No.14/2008 in vogue at the relevant time provided for permission to airmen to apply for civil posts/services under the Central/State Government and Public Sector Undertakings (PSU) in Group `A' or equivalent posts, on completion of seven years of service with the respondents no.1 to 3 IAF; (vi) another AFO No.04/2012 dated 31st May, 2012 laid down the eligibility and procedure with respect to Airmen/Non-Combatant Employees [NCs(E)], for grant of permission to apply for civil post/service under the Central/State Government/PSUs and Government of India Undertaking/Corporation as well as for grant of NOC; (vii) the respondents no.1 to 3 IAF issued AFO No.33/2017, nullifying all earlier AFOs including AFO No.14/2008 and AFO No.04/2012 aforesaid, on the procedure of discharge; the said AFO No.33/2017 drastically changed the scenario for airmen seeking better career opportunities and imposed additional conditions on the eligibility criteria for applying in civil post under the State/Central Government; (viii) Clause 6 of AFO No.33/2017 provides as under:

    "Eligibility Criteria

    6. Airmen/NCs(E) of the IAF are eligible to apply for civil posts/services with prior permission from the Competent Air Force Authority. Airmen/NCs(E) including those on deputation shall be eligible for seeking permission to apply for the following category of posts:

CategoryDescription of PostEligibility CriteriaCompetent AuthorityFormat of NOC
Category-IGroup A/I and Group B/II Gazetted posts through UPSC and State Public Service Commission only. (Recruitment advertisement must clearly mention the Group of the Post)(a) Airmen with minimum Skill Grade A and seven years of service.
(b) NCs(E) irrespective of length of service.
AOC, AFRO Appendix A
Category-IIAny civil post in Govt/PSU/Private SectorAirmen who are left with one year of residual service prior to expiry of their initial Regular Engagement (RE)/Extended RE Provided they have submitted unwillingness/denied further extension of service.AOC/Stn Cdr/CO*Appendix B

    * CO in the AFO refers to CO of an independent Unit.";

(ix) with the introduction of AFO No.33/2017, the respondents no.1 to 3 IAF have imposed additional conditions including skill level `A', for applying in civil post and which conditions have made it difficult for the airmen to seek discharge from service from the respondents no.1 to 3 IAF; (x) the additional conditions imposed vide AFO No.33/2017 destroy the career prospects of airmen; (xi) while under the earlier AFOs the only condition to seek discharge from IAF was to serve for a minimum period, under the AFO No.33/2017, an additional condition like the minimum skill grade `A; along with minimum seven y

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top