IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, Asha Menon, JJ.
Sonu - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) No. 3311 of 2020
Decided On : 05-08-2020
JUDGMENT
[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. The petitioner, a Corporal in the respondents no.1 to 3 Indian Air Force (IAF), having been denied No Objection Certificate (NOC) as well as discharge from service of the respondents no.1 to 3 IAF, for joining the post of Assistant Professor (College Cadre) in the subject of Economics in the Department of Higher Education of the Government of Haryana, on the ground of the petitioner not having skill grade `A', has filed this petition seeking mandamus, directing the respondents no.1 to 3 IAF to issue NOC as well as discharge from service to the petitioner for joining the post of Assistant Professor (College Cadre) in the subject of Economics in Haryana.
2. It is the case of the petitioner, that (i) the petitioner, after completing his 10+2 applied for the post of Aircraftsman with the respondents no.1 to 3 IAF and on being successful, was on 29th December, 2010 enrolled as an Aircraftsman; (ii) the petitioner was promoted to the rank of Corporal on 3rd January, 2016; (iii) the petitioner, with the approval of the respondents no.1 to 3 IAF, completed his post graduation in Economics while serving the IAF; (iv) the respondents no.1 to 3 IAF encourages career progression for all airmen, while in service of IAF; (v) Air Force Order (AFO) No.14/2008 in vogue at the relevant time provided for permission to airmen to apply for civil posts/services under the Central/State Government and Public Sector Undertakings (PSU) in Group `A' or equivalent posts, on completion of seven years of service with the respondents no.1 to 3 IAF; (vi) another AFO No.04/2012 dated 31st May, 2012 laid down the eligibility and procedure with respect to Airmen/Non-Combatant Employees [NCs(E)], for grant of permission to apply for civil post/service under the Central/State Government/PSUs and Government of India Undertaking/Corporation as well as for grant of NOC; (vii) the respondents no.1 to 3 IAF issued AFO No.33/2017, nullifying all earlier AFOs including AFO No.14/2008 and AFO No.04/2012 aforesaid, on the procedure of discharge; the said AFO No.33/2017 drastically changed the scenario for airmen seeking better career opportunities and imposed additional conditions on the eligibility criteria for applying in civil post under the State/Central Government; (viii) Clause 6 of AFO No.33/2017 provides as under:
"Eligibility Criteria
6. Airmen/NCs(E) of the IAF are eligible to apply for civil posts/services with prior permission from the Competent Air Force Authority. Airmen/NCs(E) including those on deputation shall be eligible for seeking permission to apply for the following category of posts:
| Category | Description of Post | Eligibility Criteria | Competent Authority | Format of NOC |
| Category-I | Group A/I and Group B/II Gazetted posts through UPSC and State Public Service Commission only. (Recruitment advertisement must clearly mention the Group of the Post) | (a) Airmen with minimum Skill Grade A and seven years of service. (b) NCs(E) irrespective of length of service. | AOC, AFRO Appendix A | |
| Category-II | Any civil post in Govt/PSU/Private Sector | Airmen who are left with one year of residual service prior to expiry of their initial Regular Engagement (RE)/Extended RE Provided they have submitted unwillingness/denied further extension of service. | AOC/Stn Cdr/CO* | Appendix B |
* CO in the AFO refers to CO of an independent Unit.";
(ix) with the introduction of AFO No.33/2017, the respondents no.1 to 3 IAF have imposed additional conditions including skill level `A', for applying in civil post and which conditions have made it difficult for the airmen to seek discharge from service from the respondents no.1 to 3 IAF; (x) the additional conditions imposed vide AFO No.33/2017 destroy the career prospects of airmen; (xi) while under the earlier AFOs the only condition to seek discharge from IAF was to serve for a minimum period, under the AFO No.33/2017, an additional condition like the minimum skill grade `A; along with minimum seven y
AI
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.