SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Gautam Gambhir – Appellant
Versus
Jai Ambay Traders – Respondent


Table of Content
1. application to decide pending matters in the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. delay in filing responses from defendants and implications. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. mandatory vs directory provisions on filing timelines. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. recognition of deadlines in legal responses. (Para 16 , 18 , 19 , 20)
5. court rules on filing documentation and ramifications for failure. (Para 34 , 35 , 36)
6. final judgement on delays and closure of responses. (Para 60 , 61 , 62)

JUDGMENT

V. Kameswar Rao, J.

I.A. 2906/2019 in CS(OS) 149/2018 & OA 22/2019 in CS(OS) 182/2019

1. By this order, I shall decide an application being I.A. 2906/2018 in CS(OS) 149/2018 and Chamber Appeal being OA 122/2019 in CS(OS) 182/2019. I.A. 2906/2019 has been filed by defendant Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 6 in the said suit, whereby defendant Nos. 2, 3 and 6 have sought condonation of 131 days delay and defendant No.4 has sought condonation of 15 days delay in filing the written statement. Similarly, the Chamber Appeal being OA 122/2019 has been filed by the plaintiffs challenging the order of the learned Joint Registrar dated September 30, 2019 whereby the learned Joint Registrar has closed the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top