IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Mohd. Jafar - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 4589 of 2020 & CM Appls. 16586 of 2020, 16587 of 2020 and 26728 of 2020
Decided On : 20-10-2020
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed regarding barricades obstructing mosque access. (Para 2) |
| 2. waqf board and police present differing accounts of barricade placement. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court observes discrepancies in accounts and evidence. (Para 5) |
| 4. court issues directions to manage barricades and access for devotees. (Para 6) |
| 5. court concludes with procedural directions and disposal of petition. (Para 7 , 8) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done by video conferencing.
2. The present petition has been filed by the Secretary of the Basant Nagar Mosque located on Rao Tula Ram Marg, Delhi Cantonment, New Delhi. The case of the Petitioner is that the Mosque is more than 130 years old and is located within the limits of village Basant Nagar. The grievance in this petition is that in the month of November, 2019, barricades were placed in front of the Mosque's entrance and three constables were posted to perform picketing duty, which is causing inconvenience to the devotees, to access the gate of the Mosque. Accordingly, the prayer in the present petition is that the Delhi Police (hereinafter as `police') ought to remove the barricades from its present place and move it a few meters ahead or behind the gate of the Mosque.
3. The Waqf Board has filed its response to this petition and in the affidavit, it is stated that the counsel Mr. Wajeeh Shafiq himself visited the spot on 17th September, 2020 and found that the police has placed three barricades to slow down the incoming traffic for the purpose of checking. At the time of his visit, the barricades were manned by two armed policemen and according to him, the checking starts in the afternoon and continues till midnight and thereafter the barricades are removed, but placed in front of the gate of the Mosque. He relies upon the satellite images taken from the Google Earth maps to show the staggered manner in which the barricades are placed.
4. The Delhi police has placed its status report on record. The submission of Mr. Sanjay Dewan, ld. counsel appearing for the police is that the police has placed barricades, but these barricades do not block the entrance to the Mosque. There are two shops which are run by the Mosque Management Committee and the revenue from these shops is used to manage the Mosque. There were some PCR calls on this stretch of Rao Tula Ram Marg, which have been received and incidents of snatching, robberies and accidents were reported. The police found that the traffic which comes out from Vasant Vihar going to Gurgaon was exiting Vasant Vihar without any checking and the Mosque is located in an isolated area. Accordingly, barricades were put up. He further submits that a picket has also been put up by the police about 10 meters from the entrance of the Mosque. This was done after a letter was received from the Defence Estate Office, Delhi Circle, Delhi Cantt., for removal of unauthorised construction and encroachment on defence land and it was found that the Secretary is in unauthorized occupation of land of 0.716 acres and has been commercially exploiting the same. The police, however, assures the Court that the barricades would not, in any manner, result in creating any obstruction for devotees to perform prayers in the Mosque.
5. After going through the records and the photographs which have been placed on record, there seems to be some variance between the version being given by the police and the Google Earth images which have been placed on record. Even going by the Google Earth images, the barricades have been placed in a zig-zag or staggered manner so as to ensure that each and every vehicle entering the Mosque can be checked. However, the photographs placed by the police show that the barricades are beyond the entrance of the Mosque.
6. Since there is variance between the two versions being given and also considering the affidavit of the Delhi Waqf Board and the status report of the police, the following directions are is
AI
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.