Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJIV KHANNA, CHANDER SHEKHAR
Union Public Service Commission – Appellant
Versus
Tarun Arora – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sanjiv Khanna, J. (Oral)--The petitioner-Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) impugns the order dated 27th January, 2016 whereby OA No. 1051/2014 filed by Dr. Tarun Arora, the respondent before us, has been allowed. The impugned order directs that the respondent should be considered for the post of Assistant Professor (Pharmacology).
2. The respondent had approached the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) by way of aforesaid OA after his representations dated 17th February, 2014 and 20th February, 2014 were considered and rejected by the UPSC by the order dated 24th March, 2014. The said order dated 24th March, 2014 was passed by the UPSC pursuant to the directions given by the Tribunal in OA No. 925/2014 titled Dr. Tarun Arora vs. UPSC & Ors.
3. The present controversy pertains to the online application form filled by the respondent for the post of Assistant Professor (Pharmacology). The relevant portion of the details pertaining to the educational qualifications filled by the respondent in the online application form read as under:
Educational Qualification (s):
| Qualification Type | Degree | Subject | Qualification Level | Specialization/ Mandator | ||||||
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
