SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Balwan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Indian Institute of Technology – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Valmiki J. Mehta, J. (Oral)--By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks the relief of ante-dating of the petitioner's selection to the post of Catering Supervisor as to be w.e.f. 1.9.1989 instead of from 1.9.1990.

2. Though there are certain earlier factual events, however the relevant facts, so far as required for decision of the present petition is concerned, start as per para 2.8 of the writ petition onwards. It is pleaded by the petitioner that the petitioner's ante-dating request effectively was rejected in terms of the order dated 12.6.2000 of the respondent/employer. Against this act of the respondent denying benefit of ante-dating of one year to the petitioner, petitioner made a representation on 17.6.2000 which was rejected on 8.8.2000 i.e. around 16 years prior to today. The subsequent paragraphs of the writ petition show that subsequent and repeated representations were made by the petitioner and which representations were rejected by the competent authority on 9.8.2001 and 5.9.2001. Thereafter, fresh representations were again made by the petitioner and which were rejected on 5.4.2006. Once again petitioner was info

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top