SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Rashi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. complaint of sexual harassment against a senior officer. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments regarding the reconstitution of icc. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. need for impartial icc. (Para 12 , 13 , 22)
4. criteria for icc composition and impartiality. (Para 14 , 24)
5. importance of independent inquiry in workplace harassment. (Para 25 , 28 , 29 , 34 , 35)
6. court's directive for independent review committee. (Para 30 , 37 , 39)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. This judgment has been pronounced through video conferencing.

CM APPL. 15774/2020 (for early hearing) in W.P. (C) 3396/2019

2. This application has been filed by Respondent No.1, praying for the petition to be heard on the scheduled date i.e., 21st July, 2020. Since the matter was taken up on 21st July, 2020, this application is disposed of as infructuous.

REVIEW PET.46/2020 & CM APPL. 4190/2020 (for stay) in W.P. (C) 3396/2019

3. The present review petition has been filed seeking review of the order/judgment dated 6th December, 2019 passed by this Court by which the writ was disposed of with the following directions:

    "9..Accordingly, the following directions are issued:

    i. The ICC shall now be constituted strict

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top