SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA
Kanarath Payattiyath Balraj – Appellant
Versus
Raja Arora – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mukta Gupta, J. (Oral)--Petitioner by way of Crl.M.C.Nos. 3303/2016, 3310/2016, 3312/2016, 3314/2016, 3317/2016, 3318/2016, 3319/2016, 3320/2016, 3321/2016, 3323/2016, 3324/2016, 3325/2016, 3327/2016, 3328/2016, 3329/2016, 3331/2016 and 3334/2016 challenges the order dated 9th May, 2016 summoning him for offence punishable under Sections 138 read with 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (in short the NI Act) in Criminal Complaint cases Nos. 6/1/16, 18/1/16, 20/1/16, 19/1/16, 21/1/16, 12/1/16, 11/1/16, 14/1/16, 8/1/16, 13/1/16, 10/1/16, 15/1/16, 9/1/16, 17/1/116, 16/1/16, 7/1/16, 22/1/16 and seeks quashing of complaints as well. By way of Crl.M.C.Nos. 3311/2016, 3313/2016, 3315/2016, 3316/2016, 3322/2016, 3326/2016, 3330/2016, 3332/2016, 3333/2016, 3335/2016 the petitioner challenges the order dated 30th March, 2016 summoning him for offence punishable under Sections 138 read with 142 of the NI Act in Criminal Complaint cases Nos. 33/1/16, 28/1/16, 29/1/16, 31/1/16, 32/1/16, 36/1/16, 35/1/16, 23/1/16, 24/1/16, 27/1/16 and seeks quashing of complaints as well.

2. Complaints as noted above were filed by two respondents (separately) Raja Arora and Ashok Arora against M/s.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top