SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
National Highways Authority of India - Appellant
Versus
Punjab National Bank - Respondent
O.M.P. (COMM) 442 of 2020 & I.A. 6166 of 2020
Decided On : 04-01-2021




NHAI is contractually obliged to pay 90% of the Debt Due to lenders irrespective of defaults by the concessionaire, with no deductions permitted.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34 - Challenge to arbitral award dated 24th March, 2020, concerning a concession agreement for highway construction. The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) sought to contest the award on grounds of alleged defaults by the concessionaire, Jetpur Somnath Tollways Pvt. Ltd. (JST). (Para 1)

(B) Legal Principle - The court affirmed that a reviewing court must limit its intervention to instances of patent illegality or violation of fundamental policies of Indian law, thus ruling that NHAI had no grounds for denial of the termination payment to the lenders as it breached the express terms of the Concession Agreement. Under Clause 37.3.1, NHAI was mandated to pay 90% of the Debt Due irrespective of JST's defaults. (Paras 31.2.1-31.2.6)

(C) Facts of the Case - NHAI entered into a Concession Agreement with JST for construction and operation of a highway. JST faced issues with land acquisition and failed to pay premiums, resulting in NHAI issuing termination notices. JST alleged defaults by NHAI as well and initiated arbitration. (Paras 2-8)

(D) Findings of Court - The arbitral tribunal held that NHAI was contractually bound to pay 90% of the Debt Due to the lenders without deductions despite NHAI's claims against JST. The tribunal directed return of a bank guarantee to JST. (Paras 30-36) (E) Issues - Whether NHAI could offset amounts allegedly due against JST for its obligations under the terminated Concession Agreement and the interpretation of terms related to the termination payment due to lenders. (Paras 31.2.1-31.2.6) (F) Ratio Decidendi - The court underscored that the terms of the Concession Agreement required NHAI to pay the termination payment unconditionally and that JST's performance defaults did not relieve NHAI of this obligation. (Paras 31.2.1-31.2.6) (G)

Result: The challenge by NHAI to the arbitral award failed; it was ordered to deposit the termination payment into an escrow account without deductions. (Para 36).

JUDGMENT

(Video-Conferencing)

1. The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) seeks, by means of this petition, under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1996 Act"), to challenge the Award, dated 24th March, 2020, of the learned Arbitral Tribunal. The extent, to which NHAI is aggrieved by the impugned Award, would become apparent from the recital that follows.

Facts

2. NHAI invited bids, for construction, operation and maintenance of the Jetpur-Somnath section of NH-8D, spanning 127 km, in the state of Gujarat, on Design, Build, Finance, Operate and Transfer (DBFOT) basis. The bid of a consortium, comprising IDFC Projects Ltd and PLUS Expressways Berhad, of which IDFC Projects Ltd was the lead member, was accepted and a letter of award, dated 13th September, 2010, was issued in favour of the said consortium. The consortium, subsequently, incorporated a Special Purpose Vehicle, i.e. Jetpur Somnath Tollways Pvt. Ltd. (Respondent No 2 herein and referred to, hereinafter, as "JST"), for executing the contract.

3. A Concession Agreement, dated 7th February, 2011, followed, between JST and NHAI. Article 3.1 of the Concession Agreement granted the exclusive right, licence and authority to construct, operate and maintain the Project Highway, for 30 years from the Appointed Date, to JST. Subsequently, the Appointed Date was fixed, with consent of all parties, as 31st March, 2012, as recorded in the Minutes of the Meeting held, among the parties, on 27th March, 2012. Among the covenants of the Concession Agreement were the following:

(i) Article 14 dealt with the "Completion Certificate". Clause 14.2 stipulated that, upon completion of the construction works and on tests, carried out thereon, being successful, the Independent Engineer would issue, to the Concessionaire and NHAI, a Completion Certificate, in the form set forth in Schedule J to the Concession Agreement. Clause 14.3 provided for issuance of a Provisional Certificate and read, with its sub-Clauses, thus:

    "14.3 Provisional Certificate

    14.3.1 The Independent Engineer may, at the request of the Concessionaire, issue a provisional certificate of completion substantially in the form set forth in Scheduled-J (the "Provisional Certificate") if the Tests are successful and the Project Highway can be safely and reliably placed in commercial operation though certain works of things forming part thereof are outstanding and not yet complete. In such an event, the Provisional Certificate shall have appended thereto a list of outstanding items signed jointly by the Independent Engineer and the Concessionaire (the "Punch List"); provided that the Independent Engineer shall not withhold the Provisional Certificate for reason of any work remaining incomplete if the delay in completion thereof is attributable to the Authority.

    14.3.2 The Parties hereto expressly agree that Provisional Certificate under this Clause 14.3 may, upon request of the Concessionaire to this effect, be issued for operating part of the Project Highway, if at least 75% (seventy-five percent) of the total length of the Project Highway has been completed. Upon the issue of such Provisional Certificate, the provisions of Article 15 shall apply to such completed part."

The Punch List items were required to be completed in terms of Clause 14.4, which read as under:

    "14.4 Completion of Punch List items

    14.4.1 All items in the Punch List shall be completed by the Concessionaire within 90 (ninety) days of the date of issue of the Provisional Certificate and for any delay thereafter, other than for reasons solely attributable to the Authority or due to Force Majeure, the Authority shall be entitled to recover Damages from the Concessionaire to be calculated and paid for each day of delay until all items are completed, at the lower of (a) 0.1% (zero point one percent) of the Performance Security and (b) 0.2%(zero point two percent) of the cost of completing such item

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top