DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
National Highways Authority of India – Appellant
Versus
Punjab National Bank – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Video-Conferencing)
1. The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) seeks, by means of this petition, under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1996 Act"), to challenge the Award, dated 24th March, 2020, of the learned Arbitral Tribunal. The extent, to which NHAI is aggrieved by the impugned Award, would become apparent from the recital that follows.
Facts
2. NHAI invited bids, for construction, operation and maintenance of the Jetpur-Somnath section of NH-8D, spanning 127 km, in the state of Gujarat, on Design, Build, Finance, Operate and Transfer (DBFOT) basis. The bid of a consortium, comprising IDFC Projects Ltd and PLUS Expressways Berhad, of which IDFC Projects Ltd was the lead member, was accepted and a letter of award, dated 13th September, 2010, was issued in favour of the said consortium. The consortium, subsequently, incorporated a Special Purpose Vehicle, i.e. Jetpur Somnath Tollways Pvt. Ltd. (Respondent No 2 herein and referred to, hereinafter, as "JST"), for executing the contract.
3. A Concession Agreement, dated 7th February, 2011, followed, between JST and NHAI. Article 3.1 of the Concession
NHAI is contractually obliged to pay 90% of the Debt Due to lenders irrespective of defaults by the concessionaire, with no deductions permitted.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited scope of interference in an appeal under Section 37 of the Act, 1996 and the importance of interpreting and applying the provisions of ....
Point of Law - Limited scope of the jurisdiction of this Court vested in it by Section 34 of the 1996 Act, no occasion arises for this Court to revisit the said findings of the learned Arbitral Tribu....
Point of Law : Limited scope of the jurisdiction of this Court vested in it by Section 34 of the 1996 Act, no occasion arises for this Court to revisit the said findings of the learned Arbitral Tribu....
The court found that the contract in question is in the nature of a commercial contract and cannot be enforced specifically under the Specific Relief Act. The Tribunal held that NHAI's exercise of po....
The court determined that the petition for termination of the Concession Agreement by a non-party under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act was beyond its scope, as it sought final relief rather than in....
An expulsion under a contract must have legitimate causes, and unjustified actions by one party render such expulsion illegal, reaffirming constraints under arbitration frameworks.
In international commercial arbitration, challenges to awards are limited to specific legal grounds, and mere dissatisfaction with arbitral decisions does not constitute public policy violations.
The arbitral Tribunal found NHaI's actions to expel the respondent from the site was unjustified and illegal based on various grounds, including the delay in granting Extension of Time (EOT) and the ....
If the Concessionaire is able to recover any amount from NHAI, PNB would be well within its right to seek attachment of the said proceeds or take such steps for recovery of the amount from the Conces....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.