SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
GPT-Rahee (JV) – Appellant
Versus
Ircon International Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. context of the arbitration proceedings (Para 1 , 2)
2. request for extension of time under arbitration (Para 3 , 4)
3. interpretation of section 29a for extension (Para 5)
4. decision to allow extension of time (Para 6 , 7)

ORDER

(Video-Conferencing)

1. This is an application under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the "1996 Act"). The arbitration, to which the application relates and pertaining to the disputes between the parties to this application, was being conducted by Hon'ble Mr. Justice A. K. Sikri, an eminent retired Judge of the Supreme Court and a former Judge of this court.

2. The learned Arbitrator passed his award, in the arbitral proceedings, on 19th December, 2020. Section 33(1)(a) allows the parties, to any arbitral proceedings, to move an application for correction, before the learned arbitral tribunal, within 30 days of the receipt of the arbitral award. Section 33(2) grants 30 days' time to the arbitral tribunal to consider the request made under Section 33(1)(a) and to pass orders thereof. The petitioner received the arbitral award, passed by the learned sole Arbitrator, on 19th December, 20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top