SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Amit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Kiran Sharma – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to adm order under the act (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. interpretation of appellate provisions in the act (Para 5 , 6)
3. permission to appeal and case dismissal (Para 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done by video conferencing.

2. The present petition challenges order dated 18th August, 2020 passed by the ld. Additional District Magistrate (hereinafter, "ADM") under The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter, "Act").

3. Ld. counsel for the Respondents relies upon the judgment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in Paramjit Kumar Saroya v. The Union of India & Anr., 2014 SCC OnLine P&H 10864 as also the recent order of a ld. Single Judge of this Court in Naveen Kumar v. GNCTD & Ors., (W.P.(C) 1337/2020, decided on 5th February, 2020) to argue that the Petitioner has an alternative remedy to approach the Tribunal.

4. Ld. counsel for the Petitioner, on the other hand, submits that the Petitioner's father had three properties, one in Rohini, one in Najafgarh and one in Munirka. Insofar as the Najafgarh property is concerned, the same was purchased in Respondent No.1's name and the Munirka fl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top