Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Har Kishan – Appellant
Versus
President Secretariatt – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging cic's decision on rti information. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments on information sought and privacy issues. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's observations on motives and legal standards. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. information under rti cannot invade privacy. (Para 14) |
| 5. conclusion dismissing the petition with costs. (Para 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done by video conferencing.
2. The present petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 17th July, 2020, passed by Central Information Commission (hereinafter, "CIC") by which, the second appeal filed by the Petitioner bearing no. CIC/PRSEC/A/2018/168355-BJ, against the response of the Presidential Secretariat dated 24th August 2018, to his RTI application, has been decided in the following terms:
"DECISION:
Keeping in view the facts of the case and the submissions made by both the parties and in the light of the judgment dated 23.09.2019 of Hon'ble High Court in the matter of Shri Har Kishan Vs. President's Secretariat as also the allegations levelled by the Appellant regarding illegal appointments in the Respondent Public Authority, the Commission dir
The court emphasized the protection of personal information under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act and the importance of disclosing material facts when seeking information under the Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that personal information sought under the Right to Information Act must have a relationship to a public activity or interest and its disclosure sh....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
