SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Hamilton Houseware Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to adjudicating authority's order under pml act (Para 2)
2. petitioner's application for documentation not addressed (Para 3 , 4)
3. respondent emphasizes appeal as alternative remedy (Para 5 , 6)
4. court's observation on alternate remedy viability (Para 7)
5. direction to approach appellate tribunal (Para 8)
6. petition disposed of (Para 9)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

2. The Petitioner has filed the present writ petition challenging the final order dated 28th December, 2020, passed by the Adjudicating Authority under Section 8 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred as "PML Act"), by which the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner has been confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority.

3. Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, ld. counsel for the Petitioner, submits that the Petitioner had moved a specific application dated 14th December 2020, in OA no. 396/2020, with the following prayers:

    "1. Pass necessary order and direction hereby directing the Applicant (ED) to supply the following document at the earliest:

    A. Letter of request dated 12.11.2018, received from central

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top