SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 399

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, SUJOY PAUL
Abhay Nigam – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
R.S. Chhabra for appellants; Milind Phadke, Assistant Solicitor General for respondents/Union of India.

ORDER

Paul, J. -- 1. In this Writ Appeal filed under section 2 of Madhya Pradesh Uchha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaya Peeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005, the appellants have called in question the legality, validity and propriety of order passed by the writ Court in WP No.7819/2021 dated 6.4.2021.

2. In nut shell, the appellants’ case is that they have purchased plots in Empire Wild Flower Colony through various registered sale deeds and registered agreement to sell. The appellants invested their lifetime savings for purchase of plots after seeking permission of different statutory bodies such as Town & Country Planning, Indore Municipal Corporation, RERA etc. The respondents issued the impugned provisional attachment order dated 25.2.2021 whereby plots aforesaid purchased by appellants were attached. However, no such action was taken against 98 similarly situated plot holders which amounts to hostile discrimination with appellants. As a consequence of attachment of their property, the appellants are deprived to enjoy their property which hits Article 300 A of the constitution.

3. Shri R.S. Chhabra, learned counsel for appellants urged that the plots in question were not purchased by using pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top