Sandeep Kumar ASI/EXE, CISF vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, SANJEEV NARULA
Sandeep Kumar ASI/EXE, CISF – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. promotion issues concerning direct recruits vs. others. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. unlawful supersession and challenges in promotions. (Para 7 , 9)
3. delay in approaching court on promotion issues. (Para 10 , 11)
4. importance of timely actions in service matters. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
5. petition dismissed due to delay. (Para 15)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 20667/2020 (for Exemption)

1. Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.

2. The application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) 5717/2020 & CM APPL. 20668/2020

3. The gravamen of the Petitioners who are 'direct-recruited' Assistant Sub-Inspector/Exe('ASI/Exe') in Central Industrial Security Force ("CISF") is that they have been unlawfully superseded in promotion to the rank of Sub-Inspector, by Constables/Head Constables, through Limited Departmental Competition Examination (LDCE); By way of the present writ petition, they are inter alia seeking directions to the respondents to consider them to the next higher rank of Sub-Inspector ("SI") along with consequential benefits. They also seek direction/order to the respondents for publishing Seniority List by placing them as seniors to the private respondents

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTMANMOHAN, SANJEEV NARULASandeep Kumar ASI/EXE, CISF – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, SANJEEV NARULA
Sandeep Kumar ASI/EXE, CISF – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent