SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Dale Robert Brown – Appellant
Versus
Vedanta Limited – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition filed under section 9 for interim reliefs. (Para 1 , 2)
2. discussions on claim for laptop retention and payment. (Para 3 , 4 , 6 , 7)
3. court's observations on evidence and access to the laptop. (Para 5 , 8)
4. final order on the petition and application. (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. This is a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "1996 Act"), seeking certain pre-arbitral interim reliefs.

2. The prayer clause, in this petition, read as under:

    "WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that till the pendency and final disposal of the arbitral proceedings to be initiated by Petitioner and enforcement of award passed therein, this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:

    (i) pass ex-parte ad-interim Order in favour of Petitioner allowing Petitioner and/or his lawful attorney to detain the Laptop which is presently in custody and/or possession of Petitioner/lawful attorney, and shall have significant evidentiary value to establish Petitioner's claim in the course of arbitration proceeding,

    (ii) direct Respondent company to pay to Petitioner the amounts admitted by Respondent company to b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top