SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Sunil Raikwar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual overview of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. grounds for quashing fir (Para 4 , 5)
3. principles governing section 482 crpc (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. protection of child from sexual offences (Para 11 , 12)
5. dismissal of petition (Para 14)

JUDGMENT

Subramonium Prasad, J. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 4 82 CrPC for quashing FIR No.389/2019 dated 22.11.2019 registered at Police Station Patel Nagar for offences under Section 377 IPC read with Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act).

2. The respondent No.2/complainant filed the instant FIR stating that he is a resident of H.No.26/70 Ist floor, West Patel Nagar, Central Delhi working as a mason and stays with his son aged seven years. He stated that on 20.11.2019, he returned after finishing his work at 8.00 p.m., and found his son crying. When he enquired from his son, his son told him after he left for work at 2.00 p.m., the accused who stays in the same building had come and sodomised him.

3. It is stated in the complaint that the underwear of the child was wet with blood. The FIR was lodged on 21.11.2019 and on completing investigation, the final repo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top