SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Deep Chandra Harbola – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's incorrect place of birth in passport. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding correction of place of birth. (Para 4 , 5)
3. judicial observations on passport issuance rules. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. order permitting application for new passport. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode (physical and virtual hearing).

2. The Petitioner has filed this petition seeing directions for amending the place of birth in his passport, issued by the Regional Passport Office, Delhi.

3. The Petitioner is the holder of the passport bearing No. H9634228, which is valid from 22nd March, 2010 to 21st March, 2020. At the time when he had applied for his passport, the said passport was issued with his place of birth being shown as `Delhi'. The case of the Petitioner is that he did not realise that there was a mistake in the place of birth mentioned in the passport. Sometime in 2013, when the Petitioner is stated to have decided to travel abroad for the first time, he realised that the place of birth on his passport was incorrect. The Petitioner applied on 28th June 2013, seeking correction of his place of birth in t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top