IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
Oyo Hotels and Homes Pvt. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Vikas Mineral Foods Private Ltd. - Respondent
Arb.P. 402 of 2020
Decided On : 04-02-2021
The court has the authority to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when parties cannot agree on one, promoting efficient dispute resolution.
Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 11(6) - Petition for appointment of an arbitrator - Dispute originates from a Management Service Agreement dated 29 June 2019 - Petitioner sought arbitration due to the Respondent’s failure to provide required licenses and approvals. (Paras 1, 2, 4, 6)
(B) Jurisdiction of Court - High Court possesses the authority to appoint an arbitrator when parties cannot agree - Appointment made under judicial discretion. (Paras 7, 9)
Facts of the case:
The dispute arises from an MSA, where the Respondent was obligated to provide licenses and approvals to enable the Petitioner to conduct its business, but failed to do so, prompting the Petitioner to seek arbitration. (Paras 3, 8, 12)
Findings of Court:
The Court appointed Justice Rajive Bhalla as the sole arbitrator, emphasizing that the petition was allowed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act regarding the appointment of an arbitrator. (Paras 9, 15)
Issues: Whether the High Court should intervene to appoint an arbitrator when the parties are unable to agree on one. (Para 7)
Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the absence of an agreed arbitrator justifies intervention under Section 11(6), reinforcing the goal of prompt dispute resolution through arbitration. (Para 7)
Result: Petition allowed.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arbitrator appointment request under arbitration act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of dispute and associated obligations. (Para 3 , 4 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. failure of parties to comply with msa obligations. (Para 5 , 6 , 11) |
| 4. court's decision to appoint an arbitrator. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT (Oral)
(Video-Conferencing)
1. By this petition, preferred under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1996 Act"), the petitioner prays for appointment of an arbitrator, to arbitrate on the dispute between the petitioner and the respondent.
2. The dispute arises out of a Management Service Agreement, dated 29th June, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as "the MSA"), executed between the petitioner and the respondent.
3. The paragraphs in the petition which, as per the petitioner, set out the dispute between the parties, are haphazardly numbered but, for ready reference, may be reproduced thus:
"9. In and around mid of 2019, the Respondent had expressed its interest in availing the services of Oravel Stays Private Limited (the "Erstwhile Company") and in pursuance of the same, the Respondent had made several representations to the Erstwhile Company regarding the Property. Subsequently, the Parties engaged in negotiations and entered into a Management Services Agreement dated 29 June 2020 ("MSA"). A copy of the MSA is enclosed herewith.
10. It is most humbly submitted that based upon the representations of the Respondent, the Erstwhile Company (now the Petitioner) had paid an Interest-Free Security Deposit ("IFSD") of INR 17,50,000 to the Respondent.
11. Some relevant extracts of the MSA are provided herein below for ready reference:
"Article 1 "/Approvals" shall mean licenses, NOC, approvals required as per laws and regulations to construct the Venue and to run the Venue for business purposes, i.e., banquet services, wedding services including but not limited to food and beverage services, catering, serving liquor to guests, approved/sanctioned venue plans, commencement certificate, occupancy certificate or equivalent, Venue usage as per applicable law and regulation, NOC from fire authorities and electricity and water connections."
"Article 3: Term
3.1 This Agreement shall commence from Execution Date and shall be valid for a period of 5 years (five years) unless terminated earlier in accordance with Article 9 of this Agreement. The Parties shall extend the Term of this Agreement on mutual consent basis, in writing, and to be signed by the authorized representative of both Parties."
"4.2 The service provider shall on the commencement date deposit an interest free refundable security deposit ("IFRSD") equivalent to Rs.17,50,000 (Indian Rupees Seventeen Lakh Fifty Thousand only) under this agreement on the Commencement Date. IFRSD in full, shall be refunded to the owner by the service provider on expiry/termination of this Agreement. Failing which, the service provider shall have the right to deduct equivalent amount from benchmark revenue payable by the Service Provider. The Service Provider shall have the right to continue to set off the IFRSD amount from the benchmark revenue till the time the entire IFRSD is recovered by the Service Provider in case the amount of the IFRSD to be recovered is more than the monthly benchmark revenue. It is clarified that the owner shall not be entitled to terminate this Agreement irrespective of expiry of the Owners lock in, till full security amount is recovered by the Service Provider"
"5.2 OWNER'S RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS
The Owner Shall:
5.2.5 Remain solely responsible and liable for all taxes, cess or duty, any ground rents, municipal taxes, real estate taxes, personal Venue taxes and assessments and any other charges in respect of the Venue/Venue that are payable in relation to the title of or use of the Venue or in relation to the business of providing banquet services on a commercial basis. In the event the Owner fails to p