SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Oyo Hotels and Homes Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Vikas Mineral Foods Private Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. arbitrator appointment request under arbitration act. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of dispute and associated obligations. (Para 3 , 4 , 10 , 12)
3. failure of parties to comply with msa obligations. (Para 5 , 6 , 11)
4. court's decision to appoint an arbitrator. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 13 , 14 , 15)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

(Video-Conferencing)

1. By this petition, preferred under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1996 Act"), the petitioner prays for appointment of an arbitrator, to arbitrate on the dispute between the petitioner and the respondent.

2. The dispute arises out of a Management Service Agreement, dated 29th June, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as "the MSA"), executed between the petitioner and the respondent.

3. The paragraphs in the petition which, as per the petitioner, set out the dispute between the parties, are haphazardly numbered but, for ready reference, may be reproduced thus:

    "9. In and around mid of 2019, the Respondent had expressed its interest in availing the services of Oravel Stays Private Limited (the "Erstwhile Company") and in pursuance of the same, the Respondent had made several representa





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top