SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
OYO Hotels and Homes Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Amayra Hospitality – Respondent


Table of Content
1. introduction of arbitration petition and facts of the case. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner's attempts to resolve disputes through legal notice. (Para 3)
3. court’s consideration of parties’ request for arbitration. (Para 4)
4. appointment of sole arbitrator and governing provisions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
5. conclusion and order for arbitration. (Para 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes with respondents in terms of Clause 14 of the Online terms and conditions, which were mentioned in Clause 15 and 16 of Marketing and Operational Consulting Agreements dated 06.07.2019.

2. As per the averments made in the present petition, petitioner is an incorporated Company, respondent No.1 is a partnership firm and respondent No. 2 is partner of respondent No.1 and is running a hotel in the name Hotel Anupama in Mahabaleshwar-412806. Further, respondents had approached the petitioner with a representation that respondents are in possession of a property named Hotel Anupama which can be used for commercial purposes for hiring and let

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top