Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
GD Prem Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)
19. CM APPL. 4857/2021 (Exemption) in W.P. (C) 1695/2021
20. CM APPL. 4898/2021 (Exemption) in W.P. (C) 1701/2021
21. CM APPL. 4900/2021 (Exemption) in W.P. (C) 1703/2021
23. CM APPL. 4960/2021 (Exemption) in W.P. (C) 1717/2021
24. CM APPL. 4962/2021 (Exemption) in W.P. (C) 1719/2021
25. CM APPL. 4969/2021 (Exemption) in W.P. (C) 1722/2021
37. CM APPL. 5039/2021 (Exemption) in W.P. (C) 1743/2021
Exemptions allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Applications stand disposed of.
W.P. (C) 1695/2021, W.P. (C) 1701/2021, W.P. (C) 1703/2021, W.P. (C) 1717/2021, W.P. (C) 1719/2021, W.P. (C) 1722/2021 & W.P. (C) No.1743/2021
1. The petitions have been heard by way of video conferencing.
2. Present batch of petitions have been filed seeking a number of prayers. However, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that a similar order as passed by a Division Bench in W.P.(C) No.6437/2019 dated 30th May, 2019 be passed in the present writ petitions. He clarifies that neither the judgment and order dated 30th May, 2019 in W.P.(C) No.6437/2019 nor the judgments referred to in the said order have been challenged before the Supreme Court by the respondents.
3. Iss
The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioners' claims for financial benefits under the MACP Scheme in line with established judicial precedents and without any stay from higher court....
The court directed respondents to consider petitioners' claims for financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme based on prior judgments, asserting the importance of adhering to established legal prin....
Court directed consideration of financial upgradation claims under MACP Scheme based on established judgments, emphasizing adherence to principles of law without pending Supreme Court stays.
The principle of mandamus was applied to compel the respondents to consider the petitioners' claim for financial upgradation based on relevant court judgments.
Precedent judgments must be followed unless stayed by higher courts; respondents directed to consider claims for financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme within specified timelines.
The court affirmed the entitlement for financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme, directing consideration based on existing Supreme Court judgments, emphasizing adherence to judicial precedents.
The court established that previous judgments should guide the consideration of financial claims under the MACP Scheme, emphasizing timely responses to petitioners' pleas.
The court directed that petitioners' claims for financial benefits be considered in accordance with precedent, emphasizing consistency in judicial outcomes.
The court upheld previous rulings on financial upgradation claims, directing prompt consideration without Supreme Court stay.
Judicial adherence to established precedents is essential when no challenges exist in higher courts, mandating timely consideration of claims under statutory schemes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
