SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Bridgestone India Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Designated Authority – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode (physical and virtual hearing).

CM Appl.No. 4294/2021

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) 1493/2021 & CM Appl.No. 4293/2021

3. The Petitioners in the present case have challenged the final findings dated 27th November, 2020 issued by the Respondent No. 1 - Designated Authority, Directorate General of Trade Remedies, Department of Commerce, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Govt. of India (hereinafter `DA').

4. The background is that the Petitioners had filed their materials and submitted various documents with respect to the anti-dumping investigation relating to import of New Pneumatic Radial Tyres of Rubber for Buses and Lorries, initiated by the DA vide notification dated 2nd December, 2019. The Petitioners submit that they had suo motu filed their responses along with documents. On 25th August, 2020, Petitioners submitted verification documents to the DA in compliance with the email/notice dated 3rd August, 2020. On 21st October, 2020, the Petitioners participated in the oral hearings conducted by the DA, in accordance with Rule 6(6) of the Cus

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top