Value Line Interiors Private Limited vs Rolling Construction Private Limited

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Value Line Interiors Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Rolling Construction Private Limited – Respondent

Table of Content
1. initiation of arbitration proceedings (Para 1)
2. agreement to refer disputes to arbitration (Para 2)
3. appointment and procedure for the arbitrator (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
4. disposal of petitions (Para 6)

ORDER

1. These are petitions under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, for appointment of an arbitrator to arbitrate on the disputes between the parties. The gist of the disputes stand set out in the petitions and, to avoid prolixity, I do not deem it necessary to make reference thereto.

2. Learned Counsel for the respondents have no objection to the disputes being referred to an arbitrator to be appointed by the Delhi International Arbitration Centre who would arbitrate on the disputes under the aegis of the DIAC as per its rules and regulations.

3. Accordingly, the disputes in both these petitions are referred for arbitration to an arbitrator to be appointed by the DIAC. The DIAC, while doing so, may consider the possibility of appointing the same arbitrator to arbitrate in both the matters, as the principal amount involved in Arb.P.250/2021 is less than Rs.10 lakhs.

4. The parties may contact the coordinating officer in the DIAC within

Click Here to Read the rest of this document