SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
Meet Pvt. Limited - Appellant
Versus
National Insurance Company - Respondent
Arb.P. 505 of 2021 & I.A. 5574 of 2021
Decided On : 19-04-2021




The existence of an arbitration agreement was confirmed, and the dispute was referred to the Delhi International Arbitration Centre for resolution.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 11(6) - Petition for appointment of arbitrator - The respondent does not oppose the request for arbitration, acknowledging the existence of an arbitration agreement. Disputes referred to the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) for appointment of a suitable arbitrator. (Paras 3, 5, 9)

(B) Arbitration Agreement - Agreement between parties stipulates that disputes as to quantum shall be referred to a sole arbitrator; if not agreed, a panel of three arbitrators will be appointed. No dispute shall be referred to arbitration if the Company has disputed liability under the policy. (Paras 6, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought arbitration due to non-response from the respondent concerning a dispute arising under an insurance policy, invoking an arbitration clause included in their agreement.

Findings of Court:
The petition is referred to DIAC for appointment of an arbitrator who will conduct arbitration according to the established rules and regulations.

Issues: The key issue was the existence of the arbitration agreement and the arbitrability of the disputes in light of the agreement terms.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the arbitration agreement exists and the matter is to be referred to an arbitrator for resolution per the agreement terms as no objection was raised by the respondent.

Result: Petition disposed of by referring disputes to the DIAC.

Table of Content
1. existence of arbitration agreement and disputes (Para 3 , 5 , 6)
2. agreement on arbitration reference by parties (Para 4 , 8)
3. disposal of petition and arbitration appointment (Para 9 , 10)

ORDER (Oral)

(Video-Conferencing)

I.A.5574/2021 (exemption)

1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

ARB.P. 505/2021

3. This is a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, for appointment of an arbitrator, to arbitrate on the disputes between the parties.

4. Learned Counsel for the respondent fairly states that he does not oppose the request for reference of the disputes to arbitration.

5. The substratum of the dispute is set out in sub-paras (a) to (k) of para 11 of the petition. However, as learned Counsel for the respondent does not contest the arbitrability of the dispute or the existence of the arbitration agreement, it is not necessary to set out the contents of the said paragraphs.

6. The agreement between the parties contains the following arbitration clause:

    "13. If any dispute or difference shall arise as to quantum to be paid under this policy (liability being otherwise admitted) such difference shall independently of all other questions be referred to the decision of a sole arbitrator to be appointed in writing by the parties to or if they cannot agree upon a single arbitrator within 30 days of any party invoking arbitration, the same shall be referred to a panel of three arbitrators, comprising of two arbitrators, one to be appointed by each of the parties to the dispute/difference and the third arbitrator to be appointed by such two arbitrators and arbitration shall be conducted under and in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

    It is clearly agreed and understood that no difference or dispute shall be referable to arbitration as herein before provided, if the Company has disputed or not accepted liability under or in respect of this policy."

7. Notice invoking arbitration, issued on 7th March, 2020, did not elicit any response, provoking the petitioner to approach this Court.

8. Learned Counsel for both sides are agreeable to the matter being referred to the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC), to appoint a suitable arbitrator to arbitrate on the disputes.

9. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of by referring the present dispute to the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC), which would appoint a suitable arbitrator to arbitrate thereon. The arbitration shall take place according to the rules and regulations of the DIAC read with the provisions of the 1996 Act. The arbitrator appointed by the DIAC would also be entitled to charge fees in accordance with the schedule of fees of the DIAC.

10. This petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top