Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Dharmendr alias Dhamu – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. outcome of the petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 11) |
| 2. grounds for quashing fir based on settlement. (Para 3 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. issuance and acceptance of notice. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. court's inclination towards quashing based on settlement. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 5. legal decision to quash fir and proceedings. (Para 10) |
CRL. M.A. 718/2021
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 141/2021
3. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.361/2019 dated 14.09.2019, registered at PS - Kanjhawala, and all other proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent no.2 in person and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
6. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent No. 2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.
7. Respondent No. 2 is personally present in Court and he has been identified by SI Raghu Kumar/IO and submits that matter has been settled and he does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
8.
Amicable settlement between parties can justify the quashing of an FIR when there is mutual consent and no objection from the affected party.
An FIR can be quashed when the parties have settled their disputes amicably, and prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Amicable settlement between parties can justify quashing of FIR and related proceedings to prevent unnecessary prosecution.
The court retains the authority to quash an FIR when parties have amicably settled their disputes, preventing the abuse of the judicial process.
The court may quash an FIR when the parties have settled the dispute amicably and the victim expresses no desire to proceed with prosecution, as continuing would serve no useful purpose.
Amicable settlements between parties can justify the quashing of an FIR when prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Quashing of an FIR is justified when parties settle their disputes amicably and express no wish to continue prosecution.
The court may quash an FIR when parties have settled their disputes amicably and the complainants do not wish to prosecute further.
In cases of amicable settlement, a victim's consent to discontinue prosecution justifies quashing the FIR in the interest of justice.
FIR can be quashed when parties reach an amicable settlement and no further prosecution is warranted.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
