Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Parth Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. settlement of disputes between parties. (Para 3 , 6 , 8) |
| 2. respondent's non-objection to quashing fir. (Para 7) |
| 3. court's rationale for quashing fir. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. conclusion: fir quashed and petition allowed. (Para 11 , 12) |
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
CRL. M.A. 360/2021
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C.77/2021
3. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.392/2018 dated 07.11.2018, registered at PS - Dwarka North, Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for respondent no.2 and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
6. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent No. 2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.
7. Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court with learned counsel and he has been identified by SI Deepak/IO and submits that matter has been settled and he does not wish to prosecute the matt
Quashing of an FIR is warranted when parties have settled their disputes and the victim does not wish to prosecute further.
Criminal proceedings may be quashed when parties amicably settle disputes and indicate they do not wish to pursue prosecution, aligning with principles of judicial efficiency and public interest.
Quashing of FIR is permissible when parties have amicably settled their disputes and the complainant does not wish to proceed with prosecution.
A FIR can be quashed where the parties reach an amicable settlement and the complainant does not wish to prosecute further.
Quashing of an FIR is justified when parties settle their disputes amicably and express no wish to continue prosecution.
Amicable settlements between parties can warrant quashing an FIR, prioritizing judicial efficiency when no further prosecution is deemed necessary.
Amicable settlements between parties can result in the quashing of FIRs when all parties express no desire to continue prosecution.
The court may quash an FIR when the parties amicably settle their disputes, affirming the principle that prosecution continues only when necessary.
The High Court can quash an FIR when parties have amicably settled their disputes and the complainants express a desire not to proceed with prosecution.
The court has the authority to quash an FIR when parties reach an amicable settlement and do not wish to pursue prosecution, ensuring judicial efficiency.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
