SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Imran – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. application allowed subject to exceptions. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petition to quash fir sought. (Para 3)
3. notice issued and accepted for final disposal. (Para 4 , 5)
4. dispute settled, no objection to quashing. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
5. fir quashed as no prosecution purpose remains. (Para 9 , 10)
6. petition allowed and disposed of. (Para 11)

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

CRL. M.A. 719/2021

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 142/2021

3. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.360/2019 dated 14.09.2019, registered at PS - Kanjhawala, and all other proceedings arising therefrom.

4. Notice issued.

5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent no.2 in person and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent No. 2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.

7. Respondent No. 2 is personally present in Court and he has been identified by SI Raghu Kumar/IO and submits that matter has been settled and he does not wis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top