SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Satyam Khanna – Appellant
Versus
State NCT of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. amicable settlement and grounds for quashing fir. (Para 1 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. court acknowledges dispute resolution process. (Para 3 , 4 , 8)
3. quashing of fir based on settlement. (Para 9)
4. final order and disposition of petitions. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

1. By this petition, petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR No.274/2016, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at police station Geeta Colony, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. Notice issued.

3. Mr. Izhar Ahmed, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2 is present through video conferencing and she has been identified as the complainant of FIR in question by the Investigating Officers of this case, who are also present through video conferencing.

4. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final hearing.

5. The marriage between petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 was solemnized on 14.10.2015 and due to temporal differences, the marriage could not work and they started living separately since 14.12.2016. The dispute between the parties culm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top