SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Subash Chandra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


JUDGMENT (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

1. Vide this petition, quashing of FIR No. 327/2018, under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC, registered at police station Tilak Nagar, Delhi is sought by petitioners.

2. Notice.

3. Mr. Amit Chadha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1/State accepts notice and he submits that respondent No.2 is present through video conferencing and she has been duly identified to be complainant of FIR in question by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also present through video conferencing.

4. With the consent of both the sides, the present petition has been taken up for final hearing and disposal.

5. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that marriage between petitioner No.1 and respondent no.2 was solemnized on 16.09.2015 as per Hindu rites. However, due to different mindsets, temperaments and incompatibilities, they started living separately from 01.01.2018. Further submitted that the matrimonial dispute between petitioner No.1-husband and respondent No.2-wife stands amicably settled before Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in terms of Settlement dated 16.01.2020 and decree of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top