SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Raj Mukesh – Appellant
Versus
Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Kanjhawala, Govt. of NCT Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to sealing memo issued by authorities. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. defense regarding tenant's actions causing violation. (Para 5)
3. directions issued for inspection and future actions. (Para 6 , 7)
4. petition disposed; merits not examined. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

2. The present petition has been filed challenging the "Sealing memo" dated 20th August, 2019, that has been issued by the Sub Divisional Magistrate against the Petitioner's property, in view of the directions given by the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (hereinafter, "DPCC").

3. The Petitioner, claims to be the owner of property bearing no. Khasra No. 142 (plot no. 842), Village Kanjhawala, Delhi-110081. He had entered into a rent agreement on 20th February, 2019 with one Mr. Ravi Kant for use of two rooms in the said property, for residential purposes. The Petitioner's grievance in this petition is that a sealing memo has been issued on 28th August, 2019, and a show cause notice has been issued against him on 21st December, 2020 vide which it has been recorded that the DPCC has imposed an amount of Rs. 2,00,000/-upon t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top