SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Sunita Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Pollution Control Committee – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to dpcc orders regarding tenant violations (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. petitioner's case against tenant and sealing orders (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. court's analysis on dpcc's powers and landlord's rights (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. legal interpretation of closure versus sealing (Para 15 , 16)
5. order to de-seal premises and restore amenities (Para 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner/Landlady - Smt. Sunita Aggarwal (hereinafter, "Landlady"), who claims to be the owner of the premises bearing No.E-6, Sector-2, Bawana Industrial Area, Delhi-110039 (hereinafter, "subject premises"), challenging the letter/order dated 29th August, 2019 issued by the Respondent No.1 - Delhi Pollution Control Committee (hereinafter, "DPCC"), and the order dated 15th October, 2019 issued by the Respondent No.2 - SDM, Narela. Vide the impugned order dated 29th August, 2019, the DPCC directed the Tenant of the subject premises - M/s. Shri Ram Dyeing, for closure of its industrial unit. Further, vide impugned order dated 15th October, 2019, the Respondent No.2 has dir

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top