SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Parveen Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Poonam Securities Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appellant challenged prior court order regarding vehicle possession. (Para 1)
2. appellant disputed notice and loan transaction; settled disputes. (Para 2 , 3)
3. respondents confirm settlement and return of vehicle. (Para 4 , 5)
4. record taken of the parties' agreement and resolution. (Para 6)
5. appeal allowed; order set aside based on settlement. (Para 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)--Appellant impugns order dated 15.07.2019 whereby on a petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a receiver was appointed to take possession of the vehicle of the appellant i.e. TVS King Autorickshaw, bearing registration no. DL-1RQ-5078, Engine No. 4193551, Chassis No. 25458.

2. It was contended by the appellant that no notice was served on the appellant prior to passing of the impugned order. He further had disputed the loan transaction.

3. Subsequently, parties have settled their disputes. Appellant has paid a sum of Rs.1,20,000/- to the respondent in full and final settlement towards discharge of the loan taken from the respondents.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the claims have been settled and n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top